[ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Formic
Posts: 4156
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:48 pm
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 19 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Formic »

It appears the Southern League have made a rather more rapid decision about a game needing to be replayed - http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/ware/news ... 46602.html (although almost two months for that decision still seems far too long).

The original match report is here - http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/ware/team ... /1-1609000 - it looks like the Ware keeper knew the rules better than the officials!
User avatar
Pigman
Posts: 4346
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Bedford
Has Liked: 14 times
Been Liked: 56 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Pigman »

They just make themselves look even bigger mugs than they are by delaying things further! I feel they are waiting until they see what maximum damage they can do !!

They proved themselves to be clowns over the no 1 shirt fiasco - this just proves it eh?

There is no reason why a decision can't be made now, or why they can't release a statement saying why it is taking so long !!
Raising awareness of Motor Neurone Disease
RIP Dale Roberts - gone, but never forgotten!!
Formic
Posts: 4156
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:48 pm
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 19 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Formic »

Decision made on the Kings Langley game too - http://www.afcdiamonds.com/kings-langle ... ision-made

Perhaps the Southern League decisions are made by Santa Claus, and he was too busy before Christmas to make any rulings.....
Rushdenjim
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:50 pm
Location: Rushden
Has Liked: 109 times
Been Liked: 17 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Rushdenjim »

Decision made: the result stands (subject to a 28 day appeal period)
Sid
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:48 pm
Been Liked: 7 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Sid »

Rushdenjim wrote:Decision made: the result stands (subject to a 28 day appeal period)
Common sense, so why take more than 3 months to decide this?
Can't see any grounds for appeal from anyone.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds Member - 101
User avatar
Pigman
Posts: 4346
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Bedford
Has Liked: 14 times
Been Liked: 56 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Pigman »

So then, what we all thought should and would happen took them months to decide !! I can only presume that following so swiftly after the Ware decision that all important decisions the SL need to make are made at the SL new year piss up !!

Any official news on action taken against the clubs in question? I'm presuming fines were handed out?

Common sense prevails at last about the result - let us pray they appoint a strong referee for when we play them at the Dog and Duck !!
Raising awareness of Motor Neurone Disease
RIP Dale Roberts - gone, but never forgotten!!
sussexdiamond
Posts: 3612
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:26 pm
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 69 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by sussexdiamond »

With current points/games the decision would put Egham in top place, above us, on GD if they won games in hand.
User avatar
Pigman
Posts: 4346
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Bedford
Has Liked: 14 times
Been Liked: 56 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Pigman »

sussexdiamond wrote:With current points/games the decision would put Egham in top place, above us, on GD if they won games in hand.
Lots of twists and turns in this league to come - those that hold their nerve when things go against them are the ones that will be there or there abouts come April !!

Any of the sides in this league have the ability to beat each other on their day as we have seen - it makes for an intriguing few months ahead !!
Raising awareness of Motor Neurone Disease
RIP Dale Roberts - gone, but never forgotten!!
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by Trek »

All I can say is about b****y time! If that ref in the KL match had any brains he would have blown up for full time, as he could have easily done so, deep into added time. I'll take the point.

As for the Ware decision the ref in that fixture obviously didn't have a grip on the FA Laws regarding a dropped ball and consequently allowing a 'goal' being scored direct from the restart so the match clearly needed replaying.
bozzer
Posts: 2141
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:51 pm
Has Liked: 34 times
Been Liked: 51 times

Re: [ Tue 29th Sep ] v Kings Langley FC, KO 7:45pm SL1DC AWAY

Post by bozzer »

Pigman wrote:So then, what we all thought should and would happen took them months to decide !! I can only presume that following so swiftly after the Ware decision that all important decisions the SL need to make are made at the SL new year piss up !!

Any official news on action taken against the clubs in question? I'm presuming fines were handed out?

Common sense prevails at last about the result - let us pray they appoint a strong referee for when we play them at the Dog and Duck !!
Update in the FA charge and subsequent fine in the story now
AFC R&D Member No. 67
Post Reply