royston
-
- Posts: 3641
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:26 pm
- Has Liked: 1 time
- Been Liked: 70 times
Re: royston
Much prefer a trip to Royston than that dump we went to on Tuesday. It must be the tattiest ground in the League.
-
- Posts: 5831
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
- Location: Irthlingborough
- Has Liked: 5 times
- Been Liked: 180 times
Re: royston
I could think of about 10 worse.sussexdiamond wrote:Much prefer a trip to Royston than that dump we went to on Tuesday. It must be the tattiest ground in the League.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 7:53 pm
- Has Liked: 74 times
- Been Liked: 4 times
Re: royston
Kings Langley must be up there?BartonRaz wrote:I could think of about 10 worse.sussexdiamond wrote:Much prefer a trip to Royston than that dump we went to on Tuesday. It must be the tattiest ground in the League.
-
- Posts: 5831
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
- Location: Irthlingborough
- Has Liked: 5 times
- Been Liked: 180 times
Re: royston
Yes that's a bad one. Fleet was awful too, as was Aylesbury.ParcelFace wrote:Kings Langley must be up there?BartonRaz wrote:I could think of about 10 worse.sussexdiamond wrote:Much prefer a trip to Royston than that dump we went to on Tuesday. It must be the tattiest ground in the League.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291