AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
-
Oundle Diamond #2
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: London
Re: AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
I was too busy laughing that Ling wasn't one of the 31. I got an incredibly disappointing 22. :(
Re: AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
Glad to say no it wasn`t, it was my old favourite the straight line runner, but then I thought he got a few more than 1.davealbon wrote:27, the ones I missed were not too obvious I'm pleased to say.
It wasn't Sam was it?!Brownie wrote:2 missing for me, one I should have got...
- TheIncognitoKid
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:21 pm
- Location: Higham Ferrers
- Has Liked: 66 times
- Been Liked: 36 times
Re: AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
24 for me. Would have been 27 if I could have spelt ******, ******* and *******'s Christian names correctly :roll:
-
BartonRaz
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:56 pm
- Location: Irthlingborough
- Has Liked: 5 times
- Been Liked: 183 times
Re: AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
There's always one to give away the answers. ;)TheIncognitoKid wrote:24 for me. Would have been 27 if I could have spelt ******, ******* and *******'s Christian names correctly :roll:
I don't think you need first names BTW. Last name will do.
They say we've lost our money we're not famous anymore.....
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
AFC Rushden & Diamonds - Member No: 291
Re: AFC R&D Goalscorers Quiz...
That was my one little cheat, had to grab an old programme to get the correct spelling of ............ as it wouldn`t accept any of my attempts, but I`m sure I wasn`t the only one struggling to spell ............., and yes surnames are enough, providing correct spelling.BartonRaz wrote:There's always one to give away the answers. ;)TheIncognitoKid wrote:24 for me. Would have been 27 if I could have spelt ******, ******* and *******'s Christian names correctly :roll:
I don't think you need first names BTW. Last name will do.
