Membership

All things unofficial about AFC Rushden & Diamonds and general football talk.
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Membership

Post by Trek »

real diamond wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:21 am The main stand for me - looks an absolute eyesore and takes away what would be a good vantage point to watch football and having that back in some capacity would enhance the overall matchday experience for fans.

Is there not something we could do to get this back in order with the help of Rushden & Higham?
Don’t forget that old stand is now 100 years old with various structural and associated issues and was the reason why Rushden Town were going to demoted back in 1991/2.

A lot of technical work was done by a volunteer, who is an experienced Building Surveyor, a couple of years ago regarding getting it back in service when we needed to additional seats to allow us to continue to play at Step 3 level and the Board decided to proceed with the Community Stand option as this was more cost viable. The work required to get the old stand accessible and incorporate around 275 seats to meet all the necessary regulations is considerable and challenging and I understand a figure approaching £100k was mentioned which clearly is not viable to either us or particularly R & H.
However, should we get promoted to Step 2 level then there will be a need to increase seating capacity in the ground and I think we would be allowed a season’s grace period.
Last edited by Trek on Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rdusher
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 6:51 am
Has Liked: 6 times
Been Liked: 63 times
Contact:

Re: Membership

Post by rdusher »

Trek wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:43 am

Don’t forget that old stand is now 100 years old with various structural and associated issues and was the reason why Rushden Town were going to demoted back in 1991/2.

A lot of technical work was done by a volunteer, who is an experienced Building Surveyor, a couple of years ago regarding getting it back in service when we needed to additional seats to allow us to continue to play at Step 3 level and the Board decided to proceed with the Community Stand option as this was more cost viable. The work required to get the old stand accessible and incorporate around 275 seats to meet all the necessary regulations is considerable and challenging and I understand a figure approaching £100k was mentioned which clearly is not viable to either us or partuculary R & H.
However, should we get promoted to Step 2 level then there will be a need to increase seating capacity in the ground and I think we would be allowed a season’s grace period.
Was there not a time that we were given a grant for this? (Mick George I think)
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Membership

Post by Trek »

rdusher wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:53 am Was there not a time that we were given a grant for this? (Mick George I think)
I believe they gave us a grant to assist in the purchase for the new Community Stand which clearly made it more cost viable. With regard to bringing the old stand back in use I understand that we applied for a Grant from the FA but this was not considered because we didn’t have formal 10 year lease with our landlords at the time.
User avatar
rdusher
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 6:51 am
Has Liked: 6 times
Been Liked: 63 times
Contact:

Re: Membership

Post by rdusher »

BartonRaz wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 7:54 am On a separate point it's really sad to see the fanbase openly being critical of how things are run at the club when on the pitch, the club is at it's highest point. That's not me saying I agree/disagree with any of it and plenty of these comments are really interesting and thought provoking, but at one point in time we were all united in grief having lost our club, united in wanting the club to reform, and over the years the goodwill and good feeling around the club has ebbed away. That's not all on the board, but for a guy like Matt Parker who gave so much to the club to feel the way he does, is damning in my opinion.
There are definitely occasions where conversations like this can become a "bash the board" pile on, and I know I've been guilty of it myself in the past, but on this current thread I'm not so sure that's the case. The work that anybody does voluntarily for our club is commendable, but if we use the fact that it's unpaid as a shield against criticism then we'll never really push on.

I understand that there are restrictions from our landlords regards operating the bar or gaining revenue, but I made a further point around turning the directors bar into a members bar, I think that genuinely holds weight and people would appreciate it, but where's the platform to voice these ideas to the board. There's been some other suggestions amongst this thread that do genuinely hold weight.

Matt Parker's comments around the board eating some humble pie and apologising to the volunteers who have walked away and doing everything we can to get them back involved can't be overlooked.

We've been without a kitchen to provide food and create revenue for far too long, why exactly is that? And why isn't it communicated down to us? Is there anything we can do as volunteers to support this getting up and running again?

There was a time when board members were elected, now they're added on without fan consultation. Members are offered the opportunity to decide which kit we wear, but no say on who our new chairman will be?? That can't be right?? I agree we need young, fresh and new ideas and vision on the board, and although I don't particularly fall into any of those categories, I'm more than willing to get involved and try help out, but the board seems a closed off community these days from the rest of the population, and you end up becoming a volunteer who over the past few years have been treated more like dogsbodies rather than the lifeblood of the club.

We've come so far in such a short time, and while the board have obviously been a massive part of that, it's also been down to every single volunteer who has ever dedicated any amount of their time to the club. There used to be a sense of meaning in the membership, and the title of part owner, but that just isn't there anymore. I'd happily forego discounted coach travel and club shop merchandise if I thought my opinions were genuinely considered or valued in the club, but at the moment it's just a way for the club to raise a quick buck.


I think we are in desperate need of a fans and board face to face meeting.
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Membership

Post by Trek »

rdusher wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:13 am There was a time when board members were elected, now they're added on without fan consultation. Members are offered the opportunity to decide which kit we wear, but no say on who our new chairman will be?? That can't be right??
As a former Club Election Officer perhaps I can clarify this issue. Our Constitution specifies that the Club can have a maximum of 8 elected Board members. In addition the Board can can co-opt up to a further 4 members if they have a particular skill set that is needed and this is usually for only a one year period and I think that they also have restricted voting rights.
Once a Board member is elected they will then serve for a maximum period of 3 years and formally apply for re-election at the end of this period if they wish to continue. The Board then nominates the Chairman of the Club at the first meeting after the AGM which confirms the election of board members from the preceding election.
I know it is always a concern to the Board when at election time there are few members than are willing to stand for election and in the past they have been willing to discuss with any potential candidates what the demands of being a Board member entails.
Dazzler
The Staff
Posts: 6218
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 9:00 pm
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 102 times

Re: Membership

Post by Dazzler »

diamondsteve wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:10 pm
Dazzler wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 1:59 pm
diamondsteve wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:25 pm The toilets - obvious unless you like walking through piss.
Can you clarify? As one of the volunteers that cleans & restocks the outside stadium ones (before and after all matches - they are only used for AFCRD matches), these are kept clean at all times. So not quite sure what the issue is.
The u bend was leaking under the urinals, either that or some dirty git :laugh:
Assuming outside units (inside are the bars toilets), there were no leaks when I cleaned on Sunday am. I’ll check again soon. Probably beer as usually a few plastics containers left on floor in there or in bins along with lots of hand towels people tend to throw unused on the floor too.
Trek
Posts: 6546
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:48 am
Location: Cottingham
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 14 times

Re: Membership

Post by Trek »

The hand towel dispenser on Saturday was empty at 2.15pm so it looked to me as it hadn’t been filled.
StaceyH
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:06 am
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 24 times

Re: Membership

Post by StaceyH »

Ricky330 wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:12 am What ever happened to the membership survey that ran last season??? Never saw any feedback on it??
The outcome of this is now available on the members forum.
R.I.P Dale....always and forever in our hearts
Ricky330
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:51 pm
Has Liked: 327 times
Been Liked: 24 times

Re: Membership

Post by Ricky330 »

StaceyH wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:27 pm
Ricky330 wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:12 am What ever happened to the membership survey that ran last season??? Never saw any feedback on it??
The outcome of this is now available on the members forum.
Out of date(over a year ago) and out of touch I'm afraid how many members responded?? 65 out of 245???. Why has it taken for me to ask for the response to be posted??
mattparker
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:05 pm
Has Liked: 48 times
Been Liked: 32 times

Re: Membership

Post by mattparker »

BartonRaz wrote: Thu Apr 07, 2022 7:54 am
On a separate point it's really sad to see the fanbase openly being critical of how things are run at the club when on the pitch, the club is at it's highest point. That's not me saying I agree/disagree with any of it and plenty of these comments are really interesting and thought provoking, but at one point in time we were all united in grief having lost our club, united in wanting the club to reform, and over the years the goodwill and good feeling around the club has ebbed away. That's not all on the board,
I have to say I apologise if my last post added to the general negativity , I certainly recognise the difficult job the board do and appreciate the time they give. I agree with BartonRaz the club does seem to have lost its way and that’s not all down to the board.
Hopefully with our position in the playoffs we will see more great crowds and have a great end to the season, and if the board can learn from some comments made here, all the better
Post Reply