Page 9 of 9
Re: [ Sat 29th Nov ] v Long Buckby, KO 3pm UCLP AWAY
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:02 pm
by SouthRushdenJFC
Why describe it as an 'attack'? Jake ended up in hospital with a broken jaw, witnessed by enough people to confirm that it was an attack.
Five years is light
Re: [ Sat 29th Nov ] v Long Buckby, KO 3pm UCLP AWAY
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:28 pm
by Woodford Dad
SouthRushdenJFC wrote:Why describe it as an 'attack'? Jake ended up in hospital with a broken jaw, witnessed by enough people to confirm that it was an attack.
Five years is light
Eh? You're questioning why it is referred to as an attack then saying it was an attack?? :?: Or are you questioning why it is in quotes?
In which case, the dictionary definition may explain why it may not be classed as an attack... 'an act of violence that is intended to hurt a person or damage a place'. Not sure that he deliberately went out and intended to hurt Jake in the way he did.
Also an attack is....'an attempt by a player or group of players to score goals or win points' . Certainly not so in Buckby's case. :P
Re: [ Sat 29th Nov ] v Long Buckby, KO 3pm UCLP AWAY
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:56 pm
by SouthRushdenJFC
Woodford Dad wrote:
Eh? You're questioning why it is referred to as an attack then saying it was an attack?? :?: Or are you questioning why it is in quotes?
Why it is in quotes
Woodford Dad wrote:
Not sure that he deliberately went out and intended to hurt Jake in the way he did.
He wasn't baking him a cake was he?