Page 2 of 6

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:15 pm
by johno
Change is needed as in 1997 as it's good for democracy.

May 6th will be a very BLUE day!

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:34 pm
by Bob's Bitch
johno wrote:Change is needed as in 1997 as it's good for democracy.

May 6th will be a very BLUE day!
I very much hope this doesn't happen, seeing Osbourne walking into the Treasury would be horrible.
BartonRaz wrote:Hung Parliament. Another election in Sept/Oct time.
And I'm not sure this can happen, the Labour Party are skint, they can't afford a second election or an election that isn't on May 6th (that'd mean fighting Locals and General separately, which would again cost too much).

6th MAY - GENERAL ELECTION

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:22 am
by woody
I have heard that each of us will have another stealth tax imposed on the 6th

A TENNER TO VOTE

Re: 6th MAY - GENERAL ELECTION

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:56 pm
by rudolph_hucker
woody wrote:I have heard that each of us will have another stealth tax imposed on the 6th

A TENNER TO VOTE
Surely thats illegal????? IF we are in a democracy shouldn't we be asked to vote on whether we are charged to vote?

Re: 6th MAY - GENERAL ELECTION

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:48 pm
by woody
rudolph_hucker wrote:
woody wrote:I have heard that each of us will have another stealth tax imposed on the 6th

A TENNER TO VOTE
Surely thats illegal????? IF we are in a democracy shouldn't we be asked to vote on whether we are charged to vote?

Of course it is..............IT WAS A JOKE (after all the stealth taxes)

Edited....DF

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:25 pm
by wasteman
i think he was being sarcastic.BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON WHETHER TO BE CHARGED TO VOTE.I GOT IT RH. ;)

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:02 pm
by woody
wasteman wrote:i think he was being sarcastic.BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON WHETHER TO BE CHARGED TO VOTE.I GOT IT RH. ;)
Thanks for that! :lol: :oops: :oops: :lol:

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:47 pm
by CountHermanDeBanker
woody wrote:
wasteman wrote:i think he was being sarcastic.BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON WHETHER TO BE CHARGED TO VOTE.I GOT IT RH. ;)
Thanks for that! :lol: :oops: :oops: :lol:

Now now Woody, not going all Black Sabbath on us are you mate? ;) :D

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:02 pm
by woody
CountHermanDeBanker wrote:
woody wrote:
wasteman wrote:i think he was being sarcastic.BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON WHETHER TO BE CHARGED TO VOTE.I GOT IT RH. ;)
Thanks for that! :lol: :oops: :oops: :lol:

Now now Woody, not going all Black Sabbath on us are you mate? ;) :D
No........Just being Courteous :lol: :lol:

Re: Election 2010 Thread

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:11 am
by StaceyH
Let's keep this on topic please everyone....thanks